Spectators Liable for Own Safety, Injuries


Van O'Steen

Some time ago, a Chicago jury awarded $450,000 in damages to a woman who lost an eye when she was struck by a ball at a golf tournament.

That case is noteworthy because it is one of the few in which seriously injured spectators have successfully sued the sponsor of a sporting event.

The jury was persuaded, in part, by evidence that the tournament sponsors made elaborate plans to improve traffic flow and locate concession stands in a way that would maximize sales, but gave no consideration to improving conditions for spectator safety and avoidance of injuries.

Traditionally, those injured while attending sporting events have had difficulty obtaining compensation for their injuries due to a legal concept called assumption of risk.  Simply stated, it means you assume the risk of injury if you engage in an activity that has obvious risks associated with it.  Having assumed the risks reasonably associated with the event, you cannot look to the event’s sponsors or the facility’s owners to compensate you for an injury you might receive.

Recent trends in the law, however, like the Chicago golfing case, may signal a departure from the assumption of risk approach to these injury claims.

Some authorities on sports law believe the assumption of risk concept should be discarded in favor of a rule that imposes greater liability on those who sponsor sporting events and operate athletic facilities.  Because these owners and operators have greater ability to control and prevent injuries than do spectators, they should pay the cost of their failure to take reasonable steps to prevent them.

When the law imposes higher standards of liability, those affected tend to be more safety conscious.  Conversely, when there is little risk of liability for injury, less attention is given to safety considerations.

For that reason, and because the traditional concept of assumption of risk is still the prevailing view, do not assume that hockey arenas, baseball parks, golf courses, auto race tracks and other sports facilities have been injury-proofed for spectators.

Regardless of your legal protection or lack of it, you should always be aware of the risk of injury you face at any sporting event.  Attend to your own safety. Do not assume others have done it for you.
americas highest rated law firms

Other Accidents and Injuries

All Pay for Medical Malpractice

Law Weighs Degree of Accident Damage and Personal Injury Responsibility

Business Owner Liable for Personal Injuries

Parents Bear Liability for Personal Injuries and Damages Their Kids May Cause

Restaurant Liable for Injury from Risky Meal

Usually, An Injured Sports Fan Strikes Out in Compensation Try

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Aren't Reason Healthcare Costs Are Out of Control

Beyond Parental Liability, Antics by Minor Can Bring Legal Charge

Are Product Injury Cases Doing Any Damage?

Spectators Liable for Own Safety, Personal Injury

"Slip and Fall" Personal Injury Responsibility Hard to Prove

Society May Demand Social-Host Liability for Inebriated Guests, Drunk Drivers

Restaurant Serving Unhealthful Food Is Liable for Injuries

Precedent Set for Tenant Personal Injury Lawsuits

Personal Injury Claim Against Owner of Property Can Be Tough to Prove

Malpractice Also Affects Lawyers

Lawsuits Address Medical Malpractice Injuries

Beware of Vicious Dogs, Especially If You Are Their Owner

Private "Injury" Problem Yields Public Wrath

Parents Are Liable for Kids' Actions, Including Injuries to Others