Arizona Lawyers
Personal Injury Lawyer

Campaign Ads Bend the Truth, Not the Law

Van O'Steen

March 6, 2012
Share |

My law firm practices personal injury law, so most of my writing pertains to motor vehicle accidents, traffic laws, insurance matters, dangerous products that injure consumers and other related matters. This timely piece, however, concerns something that is arguably even more important.

Like most citizens, I want integrity in government. Our elected and appointed officials should be intelligent, competent, energetic and committed to serving the public interest. Occasionally, we get people like this.

Unfortunately, weaknesses in the election process contribute to election outcomes that sometimes fall short of our expectations. One of these weaknesses, depending on your perspective, is the absence of enforceable standards requiring truth is political advertising.

Strange as it may sound, false political advertising is not illegal.

Misrepresenting a product or service in advertisements can be a criminal offense. Consumers who are harmed by misrepresentations can sue the responsible merchant to recover their losses. Various state and federal agencies can also take legal or administrative action against advertisers who make false or misleading claims.

Political ads, however, generally are exempt from these requirements of truth in advertising. There is no law that prohibits false or misleading political advertising.

Arizona’s recently concluded Republican Presidential campaign produced several charges of false and misleading claims made by candidates. These allegations are likely to continue throughout the election process.

Why does our law punish false advertising by merchants while leaving politicians free to mislead at will? The answer lies within the distinction our courts always have drawn between “commercial speech” and “political speech.” Commercial communications are subject to greater regulation and restrictions that political communications.

Our society places special value on election dialogue. Those who make the law consider political communications to be more important than commercial communications. The belief is that political speech should not be inhibited by the fear of legal action. This policy encourages politicians to speak freely, unencumbered by the troublesome issue of truth.

Because the law provides little protection against false political advertising, we especially must be skeptical about what we read and hear.

Although the truth may emerge eventually from a hotly contested campaign, the burden is on the voter to spot it, and it will not happen by accident. You must be vigilant.

Highest Rated Law Firms

Contact Us

Name
Phone
Email
 
 

Sylvester Romero Killed in Head-On Collision
Van O'Steen • September 23, 2014
 
Phoenix Lawyer Van O'Steen
Sylvester Romero was killed Thursday night when his vehicle was struck head-on by a car driven by Valerie Cervantez.  Phoenix Police accident investigators report that Cervantez and an as yet unidentified man were fleeing from police after Cervantez and her companion left a restaurant without paying the check.
 
Susan Soph, Kelly Wilson and John McDermott Injured in Boating Accident
Van O'Steen • September 23, 2014
 
Phoenix Lawyer Van O'Steen
Susan Arlene Soph and Kelly Wilson, both Texas residents, were injured Monday evening when the boat in which they were passengers struck a reef near Three Dunes.  The boat’s operator, John McDermott of Lake Havasu City, also was injured in the incident.